“Pantomimic Culture” and Interdisciplinary Aspects of Its Theoretical Understanding

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31866/2410-1915.20.2019.172467

Keywords:

pantomime culture, pantomime, culture, concept definition

Abstract

The aim of the article is to identify the essence of the concept of “pantomimic culture” based on the analysis of the concepts of “culture” and “pantomime”.

Research methods. The main methodological principles of the research are scientific objectivity and systematic approaches in the use of complementary methods: theoretical (analysis of cultural, art history and historical literature), empirical and analytical (theoretical and art historical analysis of the phenomenon of “pantomime”). General culturological research methods, historical and analytical methods, epistemological principles of cognition of the essence of the concept of “pantomimic culture” were also used. Scientific novelty. Mutual integration of the development and transformation of the concepts of “culture” and “pantomime” has been analyzed in the context of the social and cultural space evolution. The conceptual and categorical apparatus of the research has been defined, in particular, the definition of the concept of “pantomimic culture” has been proposed. Conclusions. The social and communicative significance of pantomime as a cultural phenomenon is difficult to overestimate, since the pantomime act can be interpreted as an interpretation of national or cosmopolitan culture codes, a social and cultural message, an eloquent action of self-expression, a form of intercultural communication, etc. The pantomime culture is positioned as an interdisciplinary concept, the essential basis of which is the triad: man – culture – gesture that allowed us to define it as a cultural and anthropological concept; the universal language of culture that is characterized by a special sign system and uses various artistic signs (icons, indicators and symbols), endowed with certain properties; a unique means of creative embodiment of emotional collisions between the man, art and society under the conditions of modern stage space.

Author Biography

Bohdan Svarnyk, Kyiv National University of Culture and Arts

PhD student

References

Arbib, M.A. (2018). In support of the role of pantomime in language evolution. Language Evolution, no.3, рр. 41–44. DOI: 10.1093/jole/lzx023.

Broadbent, R.J. (1997). A history of pantomime. New York: Arno Press.

Brown, S., Mittermaier, E., Kher, T. and Arnold, P. (2019). How Pantomime Works: Implications for Theories of Language Origin. Frontiers in communication, vol 4. DOI: 10.3389/fcomm.2019.00009.

Corneanu, S. (2011). Regimens of the mind: Boyle, Locke, and the early modern cultura animi tradition. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226116419.001.0001

Kerr, D. (1995). African popular theatre: from pre-colonial times to the present day. Oxford: James Currey Ltd.

Lecoq, J. (2006). Theatre of movement and gesture. Routledge, London. doi:10.4324/9780203007464

Loskutov, V.V. (1999). Psihologia pantomimy: fenomenologia i zakonomernosti [Psychology of pantomime: phenomenology and regularitys]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta, issue 1(6), pp. 58–70.

Lust, A.В. (2000). From the Greek Mimes to Marcel Marceau and Beyond. Mimes, Actors, Pierrots and Clowns. A Chronicle of the Many Visages of Mime in the Theatre. Foreword by Marcel Marceau. Lanham, MD and London: The Scarecrow Press.

Robertson, R. (2000). Globalization. Social theory and global culture. London: Sage Publications LTD. doi:10.4135/9781446280447

Turner, J. H. (2005). The sociology of emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511819612.

Volkov, Yu.G. ed. (2003). Sotsiologiya [Sociology]. Moscow: Gardariki.

Yering, G. and Marso, M. (2008). Vsemirnoe iskusstvo pantomimy: Dialog [The World Art of Pantomime: Dialogue]. Teatron, no.2, pp.68–80.

Zarva, A.M. (2003). Definitsiya kak tipologicheskaya raznovidnost nauchnogo teksta [Definition as a typological type of a scientific text]. Thesis: 10.02.19. Nalchik, Kabardino-Balkarian State University.

Żywiczyński, Р., Wacewicz, S., and Sibierska, M. (2018). Defining Pantomime for Language Evolution Research. Topoi, vol. 37, issue 2, 307–318. doi:10.1007/s11245-016-9425-9

Downloads

Published

2019-05-30

How to Cite

Svarnyk, B. (2019). “Pantomimic Culture” and Interdisciplinary Aspects of Its Theoretical Understanding. Culture and Arts in the Modern World, (20), 258–266. https://doi.org/10.31866/2410-1915.20.2019.172467

Issue

Section

ART