Synthesis of Arts in Serge Diaghilev`s Seasons as a Dialogue of Cultures: the Post-reality of Interpretative Paradigm
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31866/2410-1915.20.2019.172439Keywords:
culture, dialogue of cultures, art, synthesis of arts, image, idealAbstract
The article analyzes the understanding of culture through the globalization of cultural potential in principle and a peculiar synthesis, synchresis and intentional processes that form the universal cultural and historical potential, which needs its interpretation in art. In this context, the experience of S. Diaghilev’s seasons shows the very essence of culture as a dynamic integrity. This image was high not only at the beginning of the 20th century, but also still remains relevant today.
The aim of the study is to determine the interaction between the pieces of art, which were played in S. Diaghilev’s seasons as a synthesis of arts and dialogue of cultures.
The study uses the intentional method in order to identify and research the acts of consciousness that are involved in the consideration of S. Diaghilev’s reality. In addition, comparative and systematic approaches are used. A comparative approach allows comparing various cultural phenomena, styles and genres, types of arts in the context of their occurrence. The system and polysystemic approaches allows determining the principles of holism (system dominant) and anti-holism (the dominant of the system part) as an opportunity to find phenomena of cultural practices in various system configurations: social, ideological, advertising, virtual, etc.
The scientific novelty lies in the fact that in S. Diaghilev’s season the end of the twentieth century - the beginning of the twenty-first century are defined in the context of a certain cultural auto-reflection, as there were events that are now referred to as global. At that time, they were defined as urbanizing, transformative, and integrative. The great sense in this context is that the creative groups were formed on the edge of cultural institutions that formed the newest reality of cultural development.
Conclusions. It is proved that the synthesis of arts is impossible without dialogue of cultures, and dialogue is impossible without synthesis. Culture is in some way an art that is a culture. This deep identity of art with culture suggests that both are reality, if it is associated with the fine potential (aesthetic, ethical, anthropological, etc.), and is characterized as competence, proficiency, art, creativity, which point to the spiritual flow of the humanity potential as a spiritual measurements in its absolute signs.
References
Bakhtin, M.M. (1963). Problemy poetiki Dostoevskogo. [Problems of Dostoevsky’s poetics]. Moscow: Sovetskii pisatel.
Bakhtin, M.M. (1975). Voprosy literatury i estetiki [Questions on literature and aesthetics]. Moscow: Khudozhestvennaya literatura.
Bibler, V.S. (1990). Ot naukoucheniya – k logike kul’tury: dva filosovskikh vvedeniya v dvadtsat’ pervyi vek [From science to the logic of culture: two philosophical introduction to the twenty-first century]. Moscow: Politizdat.
Bochkareva, O.V. (1917). Dialog s S. P. Dyagilevym: Kritika iskusstva i iskusstva kritiki [Dialogue with S. Diaghilev: Criticism of art and art of criticism]. Yaroslavskii pedagogicheskii vestnik, no.1, pp. 317–321.
Bychkov, V.V., Mankovskaya, N.B. and Ivanov, V.V. (2012). Trialog [Trialogue]. Moscow: Progress-Traditsiya.
Favorskiy, V.A. (1988) Literaturno-teoreticheskoye naslediye [Literary theoretical heritage]. Moscow: Sovetskii khudozhnik.
Fuko, M. (2014). Volya k znaniyu [The will to know]. Translated from French by O. A. Vlasovoi. St. Petersburg: Mir.
Gayevskiy, V. (2008). Khoreograficheskiye portrety [Choreographic portraits]. Moscow: Artist. Rezhiser. Teatr.
Zis, A.Ia. (1978). Teoreticheskie predposylki sinteza iskusstv [Theoretical backgrounds of the synthesis of arts]. Vzaimodeistvie i sintez iskusstv. Leningrad, pp. 5–20.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Anna Arefieva
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
1) The authors reserve the right to the authorship of their work and transfer to the journal the right to first publish this work under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows others to freely distribute the published work with a mandatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.
2) The authors have the right to enter into independent additional agreements for non-exclusive distribution of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal (for example, to place the work in the electronic repository of the institution or to publish it as part of a monograph), provided that the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal is maintained.
3) The journal's policy allows and encourages authors to post their manuscripts on the Internet (for example, in institutional repositories or on personal websites) both before submitting the manuscript to the editorial board and during its editorial processing, as this contributes to the emergence of a productive scientific discussion and has a positive effect on the efficiency and dynamics of citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
