INNOVATORY CONSERVATISM IN ULTRA-ORTHODOX TYPOGRAPHY IN ISRAEL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31866/2410-1915.23.2022.261012Keywords:
Haredi press, letter, typographic, typeface, newspapers, IsraelAbstract
The purpose of the article is to explore the differences in perceptions and approaches to typographic design among the various communities that make up Haredi society. In general, the shape of the letter will be affected by the division between religious and non-religious genres, as well as by the intra-Haredi social division between “Hasidim” and “Lithuanians”, the two dominant groups that make up the Haredi society, whose lifestyles differ in several areas. The proposed article is an additional tier to previous studies and investigates the Hebrew letter and its role in the world of journalism as conveying a message in the social-educationalideological context, even without referring to what is actually written. The study reveals and deciphers the power struggles and relations that exist in the ultra-Orthodox world through the images and through the mechanisms activated through them and their results, as part of the visual culture. The research methodology is based on the integrated use of general scientific methods: analytical, systematic, historical, and comparative. Conclusions. The daily and weekly Haredi press is considered as something that “under the circumstances” is needed and yet is a major player in the Haredi visual world. The Ashkenazi Haredi press is divided into defined sectors. The newspapers of the Hassidic communities preserve a long-standing typographic, advertising, intra-community tradition, based on the design style of Jewish newspapers from early twentieth-century Europe. The newspapers of the Lithuanian communities reflect the character of the public who read them, who are more modern in their lifestyle. Even though there is strict control over the content, these newspapers reflect modernism in their typographic layout and letter style selection. The newspapers in both groups undergo strict editing in both content and form, and their respective rabbinical councils work hard to adapt them to their respective readership. The choice of letter, colour, and composition are borrowed, among other things, from the world of clothing, which has many rules, and reflects what is happening within the community. The differences between the Hasidic and Lithuanian groups are evident in their attitude to the visual elements in the various types of printing and advertising. The Haredi public are proficient readers and are aware of the subtleties of the shape and size of the letter from an early age. Therefore, the letter serves both as content and form, and its use in the visual world is varied. In addition to being a tool for content, the letter will be used for an image, a Hebrew date, gematria and to create an atmosphere of sacred or secular, depending on the typographic choice.
References
Alfasi, I. (1961). Sefer Ha’admorim. Ariel [in English].
Baron, B. (2017). The Haredim. Tel Aviv [in English].
Barzilai, Y. (2018, January 1). The Gothic German Script that the Germans Forbade to Use. The National Library of Israel. https://blog.nli.org.il/hand_writing [in English].
Be’er, H. (2003). From the Language of God to the Language of the Sitra Achara — the Struggles of Orthodoxy with Hebrew. Keshet Hachdasha, 4, 128–144 [in English].
Ben-Haim, A. (2008, November 14). Shabbat Entry: Do not Mess with the Gerarim. NRG. https://www.makorrishon.co.il/nrg/online/1/ART1/811/713.html [in English].
Childers, T. L., & Jass, J. (2002). All Dressed up with Something to Say: Effects of Typeface Semantic Association on Brand Perception and Consumer Memory. Journal of co Consumer Psychology, 12(2), 93–106. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327663JCP1202_03 [in English].
Donner, B. (Ed.). (1999). Hebrew graphics, Shamir Brothers Studio. Tel Aviv Museum [in English].
Eisenstein, A. (1986). Fundamentals of Typographic Design: A Method of Study. Jerusalem [in English].
Eisenstein, A. (2010). Signs in Visual Communication. Jerusalem [in English].
Elyashiv, S. (2011, December 27). Editorial. Hamodia, p. 1 [in English].
Emdin, J. (2003). Sefer She’ilat Ya’avetz. Jerusalem [in English].
Fairchild, C. (2010). Social Solidarity and Constituency Relationships in Community Radio. In K. Howley (Ed.), Understanding Community Media (pp. 23–31). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452275017.n2 [in English].
First, A. (1998). Nothing New Under the Sun? A Comparison of Images of Women in Israeli Advertisements in 1979 and 1994. Sex Roles, 38(11/12), 1065–1077. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018834928152 [in English].
Friedman, I. (1992–1993). Why an Ultra-Orthodox Newspaper? In Sefer Hashana Shel Ha’orchim Ve’haitonaim Be’kitvei Ha’et B’israel (pp. 165–169). Tel Aviv [in English].
Friedman, M. (1991). The Haredi Ultra-Orthodox Society: Sources, Trends and Processes. The Jerusalem Institute for Israel Studies [in English].
Galperin, D. (2016). Be’rosh Charedi, [Ye]sodot Ha’pirsum Ba’migzar Ha’charedi. Jerusalem [in English].
Ginsburg, F. (1994). Embedded Aesthetics: Creating a Discursive Space for Indigenous Media. Cultural Anthropology, 9(3), 365–382. https://doi.org/10.1525/can.1994.9.3.02a00080 [in English].
Glynn, K. (2000). Tabloid, Culture: Trash Taste, Popular Power, and the Transformation of American Television. Duke University Press [in English].
Goldman, I. (2007). The Hasidic Ritual Object [PhD Dissertation, Hebrew University of Jerusalem] [in English].
Gonez, A. (2022, April 8). "70 Years of Darkness" Supplement. Pashkevil. https://www.pashkevil.co.il/33716/ [in English].
Gross, L. (1998). Minorities, Majorities and the Media. In J. Curran & T. Liebes, (Eds.), Media, Ritual and Identity (pp. 87–102). Routledge [in English].
Groveis, Y. A. (2019, December). On the Nature of Charedi Journalism. Tzarich Iyun. https://www.iyun.org.il/en/article/on-the-nature-of-charedi-journalism/ [in English].
Henderson, P. W., Giese, J. L., & Cote, J. A. (2004). Impression Management Using Typeface Design. Journal of Marketing, 68(4), 60–72. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.68.4.60.42736 [in English].
Jhally, S. (1987). The Codes of Advertising: Fetishism and the Political Economy of Meaning in the Consumer Society. Routledge [in English].
Kaplan, K. (2006). Rabot raʻot tsadiḳ : ḳaṿim le-toldot ha-ʻitonut ha-ḥaredit be-Yiśraʼel, lime ʼafyeneha ule-hitpatḥutah [Many Bad People: Life for the History of the Ultra-Orthodox Press in Israel, for its Flight and Desir]. Tel Aviv [in Miso].
Kliger, H. (n.d.). Characteristics of the Ultra-Orthodox Media. PeopleIL. Retrieved February 20, 2018, from https://www.peopleil.org/details.aspx?itemID=7810 [in English].
Levi, A. (1988). The Haredim. Jerusalem [in English].
Levi, H. (2008, June 10). Tirza Granot: “Ninet is the Most Non-Media thing in the Country”. Calcalist. https://www.calcalist.co.il/marketing/articles/0,7340,L-3080096,00.html [in English].
Levi, I. (1997). Ha Yeroshalmi. In Ha’kipa Ha’shaletet (pp. 227–237). Tel Aviv [in English].
Levi, M. (1965). Torah Journalism: The Origins of the Orthodox Jewish Press. The Jewish Observer, 2(7), 8–12 [in English].
Michelson, M. (1998). An Ultra-Orthodox Press in Israel. In D. Caspi & Y. Limor (Eds.), Emtsaei Tikshoret Hamonim Be’israel: Mikra’a [Mass Media in Israel: Reading] (pp. 218–232). Tel Aviv [in English].
Mishori, A. (2006). Joseph Budko and H. N. Bialik’s Complete Works Edition of 1923, Modern Hebrew Poetry and Art in Harmony. Tel Aviv [in English].
Muchnik, M., & Kantor, H. (2004). Shimushei Lashon Yi’chu’di’im Be’modaot Ha’edot Ha’charediot. Mechkerei Morashtenu, A/B, 239–249 [in Bengali].
Neuwirth, Y. (1984). Shemiras Shabbas Kehilchasa — English. Feldheim Pub [in English].
Ofrat, G. (2015, July 10). Rebellion, the Chinski Version. Gideon Ofrat’s Repository. https://www.gideonofrat.wordpress.com/2015/07/10/יקסניח-הרש-תסרג-דרמה , [in English].
Ofrat, G. (n.d.). Israeli Are and Jewish Tradition. Da’at. Retrieved May 3, 2022, from https://www.daat.ac.il/daat/art/yahadut/haisraelit.htm [in English].
Oryan, S. (1997). Lasgon Tznua, Nefesh Tznua: D’dfusei Tikshoret Mi’lu’liim Be’kerev Banot Ve’nashim Charediot. In Hebrew Linguistics: Sociolinguistics — Language and Society in Israel (pp. 41–42). Ramat Gan [in English].
Pfeffer, J. (2016). Conservative Harediism: The Challenge. Hashiloach, 2, 115–135 [in English].
Pludwinski, I. (2008). Ha’ot ‘Shir’ Ve’shir Ha’shirim — Tochen Ve’Tzura. In Y. Recanati (Ed.), Me’gila Kich’tava (pp. 132–145). Jerusalem [in Bulgarian].
Rakover, N. (1991). Nivei Talmud [Snowy Talmud]. Jerusalem [in Latin].
Schudson, M. (1981). Criticizing the Critics of Advertising: Toward a Sociological View of Marketing. Theory. Culture & Society, 3, 3–12 [in English].
Schudson, M. (1984). Advertising, the Uneasy Persuasion. Basic Books [in English].
Shachar, I. (2005, October 6). Be’ezrat Hashem and the TGI. Haaretz, p. 3B [in English].
Shahar, R. N.-B. (2011). Images and Representations of Ultra Orthodox (Haredi) Women in the Haredi Women’s Press since the Establishment of the State of Israel. Kesher, 41, 88–100 [in English].
Shalita, R. (2013). Dialogue with Contemporary Art. Mofet Institute [in English].
Shaw, P., & Bain, P. (1998). Blackletter: Type and National Identity. The Cooper Union [in English].
Shkedi, H. (2022, February 4). Nil’hamim Be’yated Ne’eman: K’tifa Hashavuon Ha’kasher La’isha Ha’datit. Kikar Hashabat. https://www.kikar.co.il/haredim-news
Sivan, I. (1991). The Embedded Culture. Alpaim, 4, 45–99 [in English].
Sten, Y., Brown, B., Neuman, K. Katz, G., & Kedar, N. (2015). When Judaism Meets the State. Tel Aviv [in English].
Stern, G. (2004). Al Tipogarphia Ve’otiyot D’fus. Ra’anana [in English].
Tantillo, J., Di Lorenzo-Aiss, J., & Mathisen, R. E. (1995). Qualifying Perceived Differences in Type Styles: An Explaratory Study. Psychology & Marketing, 12(5), 447–457. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.4220120508 [in English].
The Herald (Daily). (2022, May 6). In Wikipedia. https://cutt.ly/EKMlCcF [in English].
The Logo of the HaPeles newspaper. (n.d.). Walla News. Retrieved May 27, 2022, from https://www.news.walla.co.il/item/2909656 [in English].
Tsarfaty, O., & Zeevi, I. (2012). Betwwen the Sacred and the Profane: The Rhetoric of Jewish Ultra-Orthodox Newspaper Advertisements. Media Frames: Israeli Journal of Communication, 8, 89–114 [in English].
Weisberg, M. (2014, April 14). Journalists Exposed: Yated Ne’eman and the Informant. Be’hadrei Charedim. http://www.bhol.co.il/news/753903 [in English].
Yaari, D. (2005). Comparative Institutional Development: A Study of the Evolution of Modern Hebrew Typography and the Israeli Publishing Field [M.A. Dissertation, Tel Aviv University] [in English].
Yardeni, A. (2002). The Book of Hebrew Script: History, Palaeography, Script Styles, Calligraphy & Design. Oak Knoll Press [in English].
Yated Ne’eman (Israel). (2017, February 3). In Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yated_Ne%27eman_(Israel) [in English].
Yated Neeman (The American edition of 27th May, 2018). (n.d.). Home. Retrieved May 27, 2022, from http://www.yated.com [in English].
Zak-Teller, D. (2003). Religious Advertising — Examining the Way to the Heart of the Religious Consumer: the Values Governing the Advertising Promise in Advertisements Published in the Religious Press Compared to the Advertising Promise in Secular Press [M.A. Dissertation, Bar-Ilan University] [in English].
Zalmonah, Y. (2007). Orientalism and Jugendstil. In New Jewish Time: Jewish Culture in a Secular Age an Encyclopedic View (Vol. 3, pp. 106–109). Keter Publishing House [in English].
Zevuluni, N. (1985, 19 June). Ofi Liberali Ve’clali La’iton Ha’chadash Ha’mitchare Be’Hamodia. Davar [in Italian].
Zicherman, H. (2014). Black Blue-White: A Journey into the Charedi Society in Israel. Mishkel Publishing [in English].
Zilberberg, G. (1968). Principles of Printing. Tel Aviv [in English].
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Efrat Grossman
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
1) The authors reserve the right to the authorship of their work and transfer to the journal the right to first publish this work under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows others to freely distribute the published work with a mandatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.
2) The authors have the right to enter into independent additional agreements for non-exclusive distribution of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal (for example, to place the work in the electronic repository of the institution or to publish it as part of a monograph), provided that the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal is maintained.
3) The journal's policy allows and encourages authors to post their manuscripts on the Internet (for example, in institutional repositories or on personal websites) both before submitting the manuscript to the editorial board and during its editorial processing, as this contributes to the emergence of a productive scientific discussion and has a positive effect on the efficiency and dynamics of citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access).