ICONIC AND SYMBOLIC ASPECT IN TRADEMARKS OF THE LATE 19th AND EARLY 20th CENTURIES

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31866/2410-1915.22.2021.235916

Keywords:

visual communications, graphic design, logo, symbolism, semiotics

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to identify the possibilities of visual symbolism in the creation of a company image using a logo in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Research Methodology. The historical, historical-comparative, analytical methods were used to conduct the research; art history methods — formal, figurative-stylistic, semantic analysis — were used to identify the figurative and symbolic language of the company’s logos late 19th – early 20th centuries. Conclusions. Based on the analysis of the works of foreign and national scientists of the 20th century, the symbol and mark are characterised as means of expressing the phenomenon essence, and the existing classifications of symbols are considered. The logos used in the late 19th – early 20th centuries in the world practice and on the Ukraine territory are analysed. The example of the Prudential Financial insurance company (the USA) shows that the use of a symbolic element remained unchanged in the process of its changes during 1860–1996. On the example of the trademarks of Ukrainian enterprises — the Ernst Mehlhose Agricultural Machinery Plant (1874–1923), the F. V. Alsop in Kharkiv enterprise, Luhansk Textile Mill (1904–2001), Kyiv Contract Fair (1797–1930) — the methods of visual identification are considered, the artistic means are determined; the comparative analysis is carried out. It is established that the image of the rock in the structure of the American company logo is a symbol of strength and security and appeals to its main characteristics. It is determined that in the means of visual identification of Ukrainian enterprises of the late 19th – early 20th centuries, there is a tendency to express clearly the company specialisation through realistic images of architectural buildings that belonged to them or produced products, as well as ordinary names with moderate artistic design.

Author Biographies

Oleksandra Kolisnyk, Kyiv National University of Culture and Arts, Kyiv, Ukraine

DSc in Philosophy, Professor

Solomiia Ohanesian, Kyiv National University of Culture and Arts, Kyiv, Ukraine

PhD student

References

Bondarev, A. (2016, June 2). Nemnogo o Ernste Mel’goze [A Little About Ernst Melgoz]. Khar’kov Manyashchii. https://moniacs.kh.ua/nemnogo-o-ernste-melgoze/ [in Russian].

Bozhko, T. O. (2011). Metodychni osnovy udoskonalennia proektuvannia produktsii hrafichnoho dyzainu [Methodical Bases of Perfection of Designing of Production of Graphic Design] [Abstract of PhD Dissertation]. Kyiv National University of Culture and Arts [in Ukrainian].

Bychenkova, U., Kudinova, N., & Solomadina, A. (2019). Znak. Ukrainski tovarni znaky 1960–1980 [Sign. Ukrainian Trademarks 1960–1980]. IST Publishing [in Ukrainian].

Dzhalilova, E. (2019). Istoriya sozdaniya i deyatel’nosti Luganskogo tonkosukonnogo kombinata [The History of the Creation and Activity of the Luhansk Fine Cloth Mill]. https://kraeved18.livejournal.com/51271.html [in Russian].

Eco, U. (1998). Otsutstvuyushchaya struktura. Vvedenie v semiologiyu [Missing Structure. Introduction to Semiology] (A. G. Pogonyailo & V. G. Reznik, Trans.). Petropolis [in Russian].

Istorychnyi yarmarok na Kontraktovii ploshchi [Historical Fair on Kontraktova Square]. (2019, August 22). Bukvy. https://bykvu.com/ua/bukvy/125283-istorichnijyarmarok-na-kontraktovij-ploshchi/ [in Ukrainian].

Kostina, A. V. (2003). Estetika reklamy [Advertising Aesthetics]. Vershina [in Russian].

Kraeved. (2011, July 29). E. I. Mel’goze. Forum gazety Poisk. http://forum.gp.dn.ua/viewtopic.php?f=54&t=1426 [in Russian].

Logo – Prudential. (n.d.). New Moon Graphics. https://newmoongraphics.com/?p=192 [in English].

Maksymova, A. B. (2012). Dyzain-prohrama kompleksnykh rozrobok firmovoho ta korporatyvnoho styliu u konteksti suchasnoi khudozhnoi kultury [Design Program of Complex Developments of Corporate and Corporate Style in the Context of Modern Art Culture]. Culture and Contemporaneity, 2, 234–238 [in Ukrainian].

Morris, Ch. U. (2001). Osnovaniya teorii znakov [Foundations of the Theory of Signs]. In Yu. S. Stepanov (Comp.), Semiotika: Antologiya [Semiotics: Anthology] (pp. 45–97). Akademicheskii Proekt; Delovaya kniga [in Russian].

Peirce, Ch. S. (2000). Izbrannye filosofskie proizvedeniya [Selected Philosophical Works] (K. Golubovich, K. Chukhrukizhze & T. Dmitriev, Trans.). Logos [in Russian].

Pendikova, I. G., & Rakitina, L. S. (2012). Arkhetip i simvol v reklame [Archetype and Symbol in Advertising]. Yuniti-Dana [in Russian].

Prudential Financial Logo. (2021, April 11). 1000logos. https://1000logos.net/prudentialfinancial-logo/ [in English].

Timofeev, L., & Vengrov, N. (1963). Kratkii slovar’ literaturovedcheskikh terminov [A Short Dictionary of Literary Terms]. Uchpedgiz [in Russian].

Zalevska, O. Yu. (2015). Hrafichnyi dyzain yak zasib khudozhno-komunikatyvnoi systemy [Graphic Design as a Means of Artistic and Communicative System]. Culture and Contemporaneity, 2, 146–150 [in Ukrainian].

Downloads

Published

2021-06-30

How to Cite

Kolisnyk, O., & Ohanesian, S. (2021). ICONIC AND SYMBOLIC ASPECT IN TRADEMARKS OF THE LATE 19th AND EARLY 20th CENTURIES. Culture and Arts in the Modern World, (22), 212–222. https://doi.org/10.31866/2410-1915.22.2021.235916

Issue

Section

DESIGN