SHAPING ONLINE CULTURE AS THE NEW CULTURAL REALITY: PHILOSOPHICAL REFLECTIONS

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31866/2410-1915.22.2021.235885

Keywords:

online culture, online platforms, online space, pandemic

Abstract

The purpose of the article is to substantiate the emergence of online culture as a new phenomenon of our time, the development of which was stimulated by the comprehensive approval of the online space as a space of existence of culture in the broad sense of this concept in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic with the reference to the cultural and philosophical ideas of the 20th-century thinkers (on the example of K. Jaspers, J. Ortega y Gasset and W. Benjamin’s ideas) and the 21st-century thinkers (on the example of E. Schmidt, J. Cohen and U. Eco’s ideas). The article outlines the main prerequisites for its rise and argues favouring the concept of “online culture” in its own right. Today, a new cultural phenomenon is being actively formed, which we mean as “online culture”. The impetus for its rapid development was the challenges common to all humanity caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, which stimulated the active search for new forms and opportunities for selfrealisation and communication by the world community. Online culture is a voluminous and multi-component phenomenon, and it has every reason to become a characteristic of contemporary culture and a new cultural form. The study uses elements of methods of hermeneutical reading of texts, comparative historical and cultural analysis of texts, as well as the method of participant observation. Conclusions. The study results show that a new stage of cultural development is currently being formed, which the authors of the study called “online culture”. The emergence of such a new cultural reality is closely linked to the online environment and digital forms of representation of cultural products. It is demonstrated that predictive reasoning about its occurrence took place in cultural and philosophical studios of the 20th and the 21st centuries, overcoming pandemic challenges by humanity; its entry becomes the realities of the present. The concept of “online culture” correlates with other cultural phenomena close to it in content and forms of representation, such as “information culture”, “digital culture”, “virtual culture”, etc. Still, it exists independently and denotes a fundamentally different cultural cross-section of the present. Now online culture is in its infancy, but the pace of its formation, inspired by the exponential development of the online space, is swift.

Author Biographies

Olesia Beniuk, Kyiv National University of Culture and Arts, Kyiv, Ukraine

PhD in Philosophy, Associate Professor

Kateryna Kyrylenko, Kyiv National University of Culture and Arts, Kyiv, Ukraine

DSc in Education, Associate Professor

Victoriia Stratiuk, Kyiv National University of Culture and Arts, Kyiv, Ukraine

MSc, Head of the University Laboratory

References

Bell, W. (2003). Foundations of Futures Studies (Vol. 1: History, Purposes, and Knowledge). Routledge [in English].

Bell, W. (2004). Foundations of Futures Studies (Vol. 2: Values, Objectivity, and the Good Society). Routledge [in English].

Benjamin, W. (1996). Das Kunstwerk im Zeitalter seiner technischen Reproduzierbarkeit: Drei Studien zur Kunstsoziologie [The Work of Art in the Age of Its Technical Reproducibility: Three Studies on the Sociology of Art]. Suhrkamp Verlag [in German].

Bystrytskyi, Ye. (2020). Narodzhennia chuzhoho z identychnosti spilnoty [The Birth of the Alien from Community Identity]. Ideology and Politics Journal, 2(16), 41–59. https://doi.org/10.36169/2227-6068.2020.01.00012 [in Ukrainian].

Eco, U., & Carrière, J.-C. (2012). This is Not the End of the Book. Northwestern University Press [in English].

Florida, R. (2014). The Rise of the Creative Class-Revisited: Revised and Expanded. Basic Books [in English].

Fukuyama, F. (2003). Our Posthuman Future: Consequences of the Biotechnology Revolution. Picador [in English].

Ito, J., & Howe, J. (2016). Whiplash: How to Survive Our Faster Future. Grand Central Publishing [in English].

Jaspers, K. (2011). The Origin and Goal of History. Routledge [in English].

Kelly, K. (2017). The Inevitable: Understanding the 12 Technological Forces That Will Shape Our Future. Penguin Books [in English].

Ortega y Gasset, J. (1994). The Revolt of the Masses. W. W. Norton Company [in English].

Ozhevan, M., & Dubov, D. (2017). Homo ex Machina. Filosofski, kulturolohichni ta politychni peredumovy formuvannia konverhentnoho suspilstva [Homo ex Machina. Philosophical, Culturological and Political Preconditions for the Formation of a Convergent Society] [Monograph]. Feniks [in Ukrainian].

Peccei, A. (1977). The Human Quality. Pergamon Press Oxford [in English].

Popovych, M. (2018). Filosofiia svobody [Philosophy of Freedom]. Folio [in Ukrainian].

Robinson, K., & Aronica, L. (2015). Creative Schools: The Grassroots Revolution That’s Transforming Education. Viking Penguin [in English].

Schmidt, E., & Cohen, J. (2013). The New Digital Age: Reshaping the Future of People, Nations and Business. Knopf [in English].

Spengler, O. (2012). Der Mensch und die Technik [Man and Technology]. Arktos Media [in German].

Toffler, A. (1984). The Third Wave. Bantam books [in English].

Toynbee, A. J. (1987). A Study of History (Vols. 1-2). Oxford University Press [in English].

Weizsäcker, E. U. von, & Wijkman, A. (2018). Come On!: Capitalism, Short-termism, Population and the Destruction of the Planet. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7419-1 [in English].

Downloads

Published

2021-06-30

How to Cite

Beniuk, O. ., Kyrylenko, K. ., & Stratiuk, V. . (2021). SHAPING ONLINE CULTURE AS THE NEW CULTURAL REALITY: PHILOSOPHICAL REFLECTIONS. Culture and Arts in the Modern World, (22), 11–21. https://doi.org/10.31866/2410-1915.22.2021.235885

Issue

Section

THEORY AND HISTORY OF CULTURE